Memphis WeatherOvercast. High 73°, low 46°.
Chance of rain 0%.

Dalton Daily

Sourced widely. Told plainly.
Vol. I · No. 2Morning edition
daltondaily.com
Markets · loading

Law & Courts

Law

Justices probe whether Boulder's climate-deception suit against Exxon and Suncor can proceed
CBS News: Supreme Court wrestles with energy companies' bid to block climate lawsuit

Justices probe whether Boulder's climate-deception suit against Exxon and Suncor can proceed

Suncor Energy v. Boulder County Commissioners drew a split bench on both jurisdiction and federal preemption

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court opened its new term on October 5 by hearing Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County. Boulder is suing Exxon Mobil and Suncor in Colorado state court. It alleges the companies deceived the public about the climate effects of fossil fuels and seeks money damages under state tort law. The companies, backed by the Trump administration, say the Clean Air Act and the Constitution reserve interstate pollution for federal law. Justice Kavanaugh pressed that view. Justices Kagan and Sotomayor compared the suit to tobacco and opioid cases. Justices Thomas, Sotomayor and Jackson questioned whether the case is final enough for the Court to review. Justice Alito sat out, which raises the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave Colorado's ruling in place. The Court will rule before the term ends. The result could affect dozens of similar municipal suits.

Why it mattersThe ruling will help decide whether state-law deception and tort claims can be used against energy companies, and it could set limits on state-court liability suits over interstate harms.

Sixth Circuit lets TVA keep building Kingston gas plant during appeal
Wikipedia

Sixth Circuit lets TVA keep building Kingston gas plant during appeal

Appalachian Voices v. TVA: panel says district court likely misread NEPA and chose the wrong remedy

CINCINNATI — On October 16 a Sixth Circuit panel of Judges McKeague, Thapar and Murphy granted the Tennessee Valley Authority's emergency motion for a stay pending appeal in Appalachian Voices v. TVA, No. 26-5836. The ruling lets TVA keep building its multibillion-dollar gas-fired plant to replace the aging coal plant at Kingston, Tennessee. Judge Curtis Collier of the Eastern District of Tennessee had vacated TVA's approval of the plant under the National Environmental Policy Act. The suit was brought by Appalachian Voices, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club. Writing for the panel, Judge Murphy said TVA will likely win on three points. The statutory phrase "range of alternatives" does not require two qualifying options when only one exists. A gas-supply precedent agreement did not lock TVA into the plant in advance. Vacating the approval was likely the wrong remedy. Construction began in 2024, with completion aimed at 2028. The merits appeal continues.

Why it mattersThe published opinion narrows how NEPA's alternatives requirement is read in the Sixth Circuit and keeps a major Tennessee utility project moving.

Senators Lee and Cruz back Eastman's bid for Supreme Court review of disbarment
Bloomberg Law: GOP Senators Push Supreme Court to Review Eastman's Disbarment

Senators Lee and Cruz back Eastman's bid for Supreme Court review of disbarment

Justices will consider the petition at their November 6 conference

WASHINGTON — Republican Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Ted Cruz of Texas have filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review John Eastman's disbarment in California. Eastman was a key figure in efforts to challenge the 2020 election result. The senators argue that political activists turned the bar disciplinary process into a weapon, and that ideological discipline could deter lawyers from taking unpopular clients. Seventeen current and former Trump attorneys, including Sidney Powell and Ed Martin, filed a separate supporting brief. The justices are scheduled to consider Eastman's petition at the November 6 conference. Bloomberg Law notes that the Court has reversed disbarments before but rarely intervenes in state bar proceedings. A California State Bar panel had earlier rejected Eastman's free-speech defense. Whether the Court takes the case has not been decided.

Why it mattersA grant would put the federal limits on state attorney-discipline power, and political speech by lawyers, in front of the Court.

Tennessee appeals court orders new trial in Memphis killing of Paris Lee
Truthout: Tennessee Court Rules Killing of Woman May Have Been Justifiable Because She Was Trans

Tennessee appeals court orders new trial in Memphis killing of Paris Lee

Court of Criminal Appeals says jury should have been told victim's sex assigned at birth

MEMPHIS — The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals has reversed the voluntary manslaughter conviction of Samuel Ward Jr. in the shooting death of Paris Lee, a transgender woman, in Shelby County. That is according to a report by Truthout, which credits a local journalist with breaking the story; the opinion itself was not independently reviewed. A jury convicted Ward in May 2025 after rejecting his self-defense claim. The three-judge panel found the trial judge erred by barring the defense from disclosing Lee's sex assigned at birth. It held that this misled the jury and could be relevant to self-defense and provocation. The state had conceded relevance only if the proof showed it caused the altercation. It argued that Lee was armed and the evidence contradicted Ward's account. Advocates, including Memphis group My Sistah's House, criticized the ruling. Tennessee has not banned the so-called LGBTQ panic defense, which 20 states have. The case returns for retrial.

Why it mattersThe ruling raises questions about how Tennessee trial courts handle victim-identity evidence in self-defense cases, and Shelby County prosecutors face a retrial.